Veganism & Vegetarianism Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those committed to a vegan or vegetarian lifestyle and anyone interested in learning more. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
I have a vegan friend that is claiming that animal milk is not healthy since, to digest it or decompose it, your body needs a lot of resources (minerals, etc) and therefore it becomes a non healthy food. For now I quit to drink animal milk until, I try to shine some true on topic.
How bad is animal milk, i.e., lactose and/or its different components compared to other aliments?
A semi-scientific approach or a rigorous one would be awesome.
For the most-part, if you don't posess an allergy or intollerance, yes.
There are several things in milk, first let's look at the digestibility of proteins:
Protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) is a method of evaluating the quality of a protein based on both the amino acid requirements of humans and their ability to digest it.
In this test milk scores 1 (a perfect score) which means that it's considered a very good source of complete protein and easy to digest.
For comparison:
Wheat Gluten: 0.25 - Tough to digest.
Peanuts: 0.52
Dehulled Hemp Seeds 0.66
Chickpeas 0.78
Soy 0.91
Beef 0.92
Concentrated Soy protein Isolate: 1 - Easy to digest.
Eggs: 1 - Easy.
Next Sugar:
Milk contains lactose which is a disaccharide which is broken down in the gut to glucose and galactose by the enzyme lactase.
Children across the world break down lactose in milk with no trouble, but the ability fades in some as they grow older and they develope lactose intollerance - roughly half the world's population can metabolise lactose without the uncomfortable symptoms occuring.
Fats:
The digestibility has been extensivley studied in rats, whose digestive system is considered a good laboratory substitute for human's:
[Diets consisting of] 5% of fat, the following digestive coefficients were obtained:
coconut oil 98.9
soybean oil 98.5
corn oil 97.5
butterfat 88.3
mutton tallow 74.6
oleo stock 74
cacao butter 63.3%.
In terms of digestibility, milk fat (butterfat) appears about in the middle of this group.
Of course, many prefer semi-skimmed (half fat) or skimmed (low fat) milk, reducing the significance of this finding.
Butter is also 51% saturated fat, so best to use in moderation.
Vitamins and Minerals:
There is an extensive breakdown at the end of this link, that I will not reproduce here because it's enormous and detailed.
To summarise, milk contains fat soluable and water soluable vitamins and a long list of minerals - all sufficient to feed a calf through it's first few months of life as it grows.
Digestion in Humans:
This process has evolved to be efficient, the acids and alkalis and enzymes released are all reabsorbed by the body once they've done their work and been broken down by the fierce environment of the gut - evolution had given us guts that waste as little as can be, in order to maximise our survival chances.
It takes energy to digest food, the body always regains that energy and more through assimilation of the digested food - except when we eat things like cellery, which provide us with no energy, but are valued in other ways.
(TLDR:)
There is nothing special about milk in respect of the body's use of resources to digest it - most of us were drinking it exclusivley for the first few months of our lives and we thrived and grew just fine.
We get more energy and nutrients from drinking it than we expend or lose and it is nutritionaly high in most of the things that we need.
So, (disclaimer) as part of a ballanced diet, it is healthy, yes.
I should like to have edited my answer in response to constructive comments in order to improve it, but nothing from the two downvotes has generated comments which clarify or add to the discussion in regards to the OP's concerns. Therefore there is nothing that I can add or ammend at this time.
The question is vague in multiple ways but I think Metatron's answer, while mostly factually true but also somewhat opinionated, badly misses the question.
Does milk need a lot of resources to digest? No.
Is milk healthy? That begs the question of what is meant by healthy.
As noted by others, most people become milk intolerant in childhood. Some populations, particularly caucasians have become more tolerant. This was via a relatively fast natural selection. Much of Europe (and some other locations such as parts of Africa) had ready access to milk. In those regions, the people who could drink milk had a relatively dependable and nutritious food source that others didn't at a time when food shortages were common. Those who were intolerant were more likely to die and not procreate so the population became more lactose tolerant. When food is scarce, milk is extremely healthy.
Today, food is not scarce. Whether milk is healthy is a very subjective question. Milk is a suspected trigger of type 1 diabetes. Milk is calorie dense where most people are overweight and should be eating less. Milk has saturated fat with likely health risks. Milk is a recent addition to human diets and, as believed by many who advocate Paleo diets, it may not be optimal for human digestion. While there are many facts and other evidence to consider, in the end deciding whether milk is healthy is very subjective.
